|
Summary of Experience
Allan C. Vander Laan, an associate of Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.L.C., is a member of the Firm’s Civil Litigation Department. He has represented numerous municipalities and local governmental agencies throughout Michigan in employment matters and civil rights cases. These constitutional claims have included claims arising under the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
In addition, Mr. Vander Laan has represented companies, including Johnson Controls, Inc., Allied Insurance, Nationwide Insurance, Ohio Casualty, Westfield Insurance Company, Michigan Basic Property Insurance Association, Indiana Insurance Company and several others. Mr. Vander Laan was also an Assistant Prosecutor
in Barry County, Michigan.
|
Click on a category below for more information
|
|
| Education |
View
|
J.D., Thomas M. Cooley Law School
B.A., Calvin College
|
|
|
|
| Representative
Cases |
View
|
Armstrong v Newaygo County Sheriff’s Department (United States District Court for the
Western District of Michigan 2007)
Mr. Vander Laan obtained a dismissal on behalf of the Defendants of this civil rights action. Plaintiff
alleged that Newaygo County had improperly impounded his property.
Cao v City of Portage (United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan 2004)
Mr. Vander Laan obtained summary judgment on behalf of the Defendants in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Plaintiff alleged that the City of Portage and several of its officers were responsible for the death of her husband in a shootout with the police.
In Re: Flood Cases (Circuit Court for the County of Marquette 2006)
Mr. Vander Laan successfully obtained summary disposition for the Marquette Board of Light and Power. In this case, Plaintiff’s claimed the Marquette Board of Light and Power was one of several Defendants responsible for the failure of a dam which caused damage downstream in the amount of
One Hundred Million Dollars. Mr. Vander Laan’s client was the first Defendant to be granted summary disposition after he demonstrated that the Marquette Board of Light and Power was not a proprietary function and did not fit within any of the exceptions to governmental immunity.
Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et. al. v Muskegon County Solid Waste Facility and Muskegon County Board of Public Works (Circuit Court for the County of Muskegon 2006)
Mr. Vander Laan successfully obtained summary disposition for the Defendants on Plaintiff’ claim that Muskegon County Solid Waste Facility was responsible for the destruction of a mobile home.
Holmes v Osceola County Sheriff’s Department (Circuit Court for the County of Osceola 2003)
Mr. Vander Laan successfully obtained summary disposition for the Osceola County in a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff alleged false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Court agreed that with Mr. Vander Laan’s argument that the officer made a good faith mistake in arresting the Plaintiff who fit the profile of an armed robber of a bank which had just taken place.
Lyons v Marquette Solid Waste Authority (Circuit Court for the County of Marquette 2003) Mr. Vander Laan successfully obtained summary disposition for the Defendants on Plaintiff’s
Whistle blower claim.
Murray-Ruhl v County of Shiawasee (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 2006)
Mr. Vander Laan successfully obtained summary judgment for the Defendants on Plaintiff’s claim that her son was wrongfully shot and killed by a police officer. The Court found the police officer acted in self defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presentations
and Articles |
View
|
2006 Presentation to the Florida Association of Licensed Investigators regarding Examinations Under Oath
2006 Seminars presented to Mercury Insurance Company and Bristol West Insurance Company regarding Examinations Under Oath, Protecting the Claims File and Avoiding Bad Faith, the Attorney/Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine; the Dos and Dont's of Arson and Fraud Investigation for the Insurance Professional and Preparing for your Deposition
“Supreme Court Rules Jury Must Decide Fault Under the Impaired Plaintiff Penalty” CMDA on Law
Speeches and Lectures
• Spoliation of Evidence; Presented to Insurance Adjusters and Attorneys, 2002
• Examinations Under Oath: The War Against Arson; Presented to Insurance Adjusters and
Attorneys, 2001
• The Attorney/Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine; Presented to Insurance Adjusters
and Attorneys, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
